<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 492 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The valuation should be done following the principles in relevant Supreme Court decisions and CAS-4 standards. The adjudicating authority must provide a reasoned order, adhere to principles of natural justice, and complete reassessment within six months. The appellants were directed to fully cooperate in the remand proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:47:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 492 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The valuation should be done following the principles in relevant Supreme Court decisions and CAS-4 standards. The adjudicating authority must provide a reasoned order, adhere to principles of natural justice, and complete reassessment within six months. The appellants were directed to fully cooperate in the remand proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>