https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387007 The Tribunal set aside the decision confirming duty payment and penalty under Section 11AC, remanding the case for a fresh decision. They criticized the Adjudicating Authority for not providing a post-hearing report to the appellant, breaching natural justice principles. The appellant's challenge to the differential duty amount and penalty was acknowledged, emphasizing discrepancies in duty calculation and lack of access to crucial reports. The Tribunal ensured a fair opportunity for the appellant to address duty and penalty calculations accurately, highlighting the importance of procedural fairness in such matters. en-us Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:46:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387007 The Tribunal set aside the decision confirming duty payment and penalty under Section 11AC, remanding the case for a fresh decision. They criticized the Adjudicating Authority for not providing a post-hearing report to the appellant, breaching natural justice principles. The appellant's challenge to the differential duty amount and penalty was acknowledged, emphasizing discrepancies in duty calculation and lack of access to crucial reports. The Tribunal ensured a fair opportunity for the appellant to address duty and penalty calculations accurately, highlighting the importance of procedural fairness in such matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387007