<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 25 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20069</link>
    <description>The firm sought an extension to file its income tax return for the assessment year 1984-85, eventually filing a revised return under the Amnesty Scheme. The Commissioner dismissed the revision petitions, emphasizing the need for a true disclosure prompted by ongoing investigations. The petitioner challenged interest demanded under the Income-tax Act, with the appellate order reducing the interest. The appellate order also reduced additions to income and disallowances. The court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s dismissal of the revision petitions, stating the Commissioner had discretion to base decisions on any available grounds. The original petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 25 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20069</link>
      <description>The firm sought an extension to file its income tax return for the assessment year 1984-85, eventually filing a revised return under the Amnesty Scheme. The Commissioner dismissed the revision petitions, emphasizing the need for a true disclosure prompted by ongoing investigations. The petitioner challenged interest demanded under the Income-tax Act, with the appellate order reducing the interest. The appellate order also reduced additions to income and disallowances. The court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s dismissal of the revision petitions, stating the Commissioner had discretion to base decisions on any available grounds. The original petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>