<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (3) TMI 30 - HIGH COURT OF DACCA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283810</link>
    <description>A defective return filed without the required profit and loss account and balance-sheet under the mercantile system is not automatically a nullity in law if it otherwise substantially complies with the prescribed form; the statutory scheme contemplates an to complete or rectify omissions, so summary assessment cannot rest solely on the footing that no return was made. By contrast, non-compliance with a notice requiring production of accounts is a distinct statutory default and can independently justify summary assessment even if no notice calling for attendance and evidence was issued. The return was therefore not treated as no return, but the separate accounts-production default remained sufficient to sustain the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (3) TMI 30 - HIGH COURT OF DACCA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283810</link>
      <description>A defective return filed without the required profit and loss account and balance-sheet under the mercantile system is not automatically a nullity in law if it otherwise substantially complies with the prescribed form; the statutory scheme contemplates an to complete or rectify omissions, so summary assessment cannot rest solely on the footing that no return was made. By contrast, non-compliance with a notice requiring production of accounts is a distinct statutory default and can independently justify summary assessment even if no notice calling for attendance and evidence was issued. The return was therefore not treated as no return, but the separate accounts-production default remained sufficient to sustain the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>