<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 997 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283808</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the deduction for bonus liability post firm dissolution but denied the deduction of additional sales tax liability after the firm&#039;s dissolution. The decision was based on legal precedents and the specific circumstances of each case, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the bonus liability and in favor of the revenue concerning the sales tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:13:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 997 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283808</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the deduction for bonus liability post firm dissolution but denied the deduction of additional sales tax liability after the firm&#039;s dissolution. The decision was based on legal precedents and the specific circumstances of each case, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the bonus liability and in favor of the revenue concerning the sales tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>