<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 43 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20067</link>
    <description>The judge allowed the writ petitions, directing the respondents to pay the due amount to the petitioner with 12% interest per annum until the date of refund. The decision emphasized the importance of following established legal precedents, specifically a Division Bench decision, in determining the entitlement to interest on advance tax refunds. This ruling ensures consistency and adherence to established legal principles regarding interest payment on tax refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:22:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 43 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20067</link>
      <description>The judge allowed the writ petitions, directing the respondents to pay the due amount to the petitioner with 12% interest per annum until the date of refund. The decision emphasized the importance of following established legal precedents, specifically a Division Bench decision, in determining the entitlement to interest on advance tax refunds. This ruling ensures consistency and adherence to established legal principles regarding interest payment on tax refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>