<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Deduction u/s 80-IB(10) upheld; Revenue&#039;s claim of inflated profits through land transfer dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49717</link>
    <description>Disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80-IB(10) - When the third party individuals are partners in the assessee-firm apart from the children of the land owners, the contention of the Revenue that the land in question was transferred to the partnership firm at a guideline value in order to increase the profit of the assessee-firm so as to claim deduction u/s 80-IB(10) has no merit at all.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:24:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:24:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Deduction u/s 80-IB(10) upheld; Revenue&#039;s claim of inflated profits through land transfer dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49717</link>
      <description>Disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80-IB(10) - When the third party individuals are partners in the assessee-firm apart from the children of the land owners, the contention of the Revenue that the land in question was transferred to the partnership firm at a guideline value in order to increase the profit of the assessee-firm so as to claim deduction u/s 80-IB(10) has no merit at all.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:24:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>