<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 468 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeals for AY 1997-98 and AY 1998-99. The Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s decision was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests as two views were possible on the matter. This decision was based on Supreme Court precedents and the consistent treatment of similar claims in previous years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 468 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeals for AY 1997-98 and AY 1998-99. The Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s decision was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests as two views were possible on the matter. This decision was based on Supreme Court precedents and the consistent treatment of similar claims in previous years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>