<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 462 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386978</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals, affirming that the purchase and sale of shares were manipulated, and the claimed Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) were deemed bogus. The onus to prove the genuineness of transactions and exemption under Section 10(38) was not met by the assessees. Consequently, the tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to treat the sale proceeds as unexplained credit under Section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:49:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 462 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386978</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals, affirming that the purchase and sale of shares were manipulated, and the claimed Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) were deemed bogus. The onus to prove the genuineness of transactions and exemption under Section 10(38) was not met by the assessees. Consequently, the tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to treat the sale proceeds as unexplained credit under Section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>