<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 457 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, reducing penalties to the original amounts imposed in the initial proceedings. It upheld the confiscation and duty liability but corrected the procedural error of enhancing penalties during remand proceedings. The order was pronounced on 10.10.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 457 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, reducing penalties to the original amounts imposed in the initial proceedings. It upheld the confiscation and duty liability but corrected the procedural error of enhancing penalties during remand proceedings. The order was pronounced on 10.10.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>