https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386970 The Tribunal dismissed the petition (C.P. (IB) No. 134/BB/2019) filed by the Petitioner, stating that the proceedings under the IBC were not appropriate due to the existence of substantial disputes and the Petitioner's failure to comply with the lease deed terms. The Tribunal emphasized that the Petitioner could seek other remedies available under the law to address its grievances. No order as to costs was made. en-us Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:51:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386970 The Tribunal dismissed the petition (C.P. (IB) No. 134/BB/2019) filed by the Petitioner, stating that the proceedings under the IBC were not appropriate due to the existence of substantial disputes and the Petitioner's failure to comply with the lease deed terms. The Tribunal emphasized that the Petitioner could seek other remedies available under the law to address its grievances. No order as to costs was made. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386970