<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 59 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20060</link>
    <description>Guest-house hospitality costs incurred for visitors, employees and technicians were treated as expenses of commercial expediency and therefore not disallowable under the guest-house restriction. Tea, lunch and similar outlays were also held not to fall for disallowance as entertainment expenditure on the governing precedent applied by the Court. The contribution to the Gujarat State Co-operative Union was likewise allowed as a business deduction, the Court following its earlier ruling on comparable contributions to a co-operative educational fund. All three questions were answered in favour of the assessee, leaving the Revenue unsuccessful on each referred issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:02:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 59 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20060</link>
      <description>Guest-house hospitality costs incurred for visitors, employees and technicians were treated as expenses of commercial expediency and therefore not disallowable under the guest-house restriction. Tea, lunch and similar outlays were also held not to fall for disallowance as entertainment expenditure on the governing precedent applied by the Court. The contribution to the Gujarat State Co-operative Union was likewise allowed as a business deduction, the Court following its earlier ruling on comparable contributions to a co-operative educational fund. All three questions were answered in favour of the assessee, leaving the Revenue unsuccessful on each referred issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>