<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 450 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386966</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petitions challenging the rejection of the request to file TRAN-1 for Input Tax Credit under the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner was directed to pursue the matter with the Principal Nodal Officer for resolution with GSTN within six weeks. The denial was attributed to the time lapse for filing TRAN-1. The court emphasized prompt action to resolve the issues and closed the case without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 450 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386966</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petitions challenging the rejection of the request to file TRAN-1 for Input Tax Credit under the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner was directed to pursue the matter with the Principal Nodal Officer for resolution with GSTN within six weeks. The denial was attributed to the time lapse for filing TRAN-1. The court emphasized prompt action to resolve the issues and closed the case without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>