<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 441 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386957</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty orders for AY 2008-09 to 2012-13 and AY 2013-14 and 2014-15, directing the AO to delete the penalties levied under Section 271(1)(c) and Section 271AAB respectively due to lack of clarity in the penalty notices. The Tribunal ruled that the ambiguity in the notices, mixing charges with different implications, violated the principles of natural justice and necessitated the quashing of the penalty orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 441 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386957</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty orders for AY 2008-09 to 2012-13 and AY 2013-14 and 2014-15, directing the AO to delete the penalties levied under Section 271(1)(c) and Section 271AAB respectively due to lack of clarity in the penalty notices. The Tribunal ruled that the ambiguity in the notices, mixing charges with different implications, violated the principles of natural justice and necessitated the quashing of the penalty orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>