<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 426 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s classification of imported goods as re-esterified fats/oils under heading 15162091, leading to the recovery of short-paid duty and the imposition of interest. The decision not to confiscate the goods under Section 111(m) or impose a penalty under Section 112(a) was also affirmed. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was issued on 10.10.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 426 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s classification of imported goods as re-esterified fats/oils under heading 15162091, leading to the recovery of short-paid duty and the imposition of interest. The decision not to confiscate the goods under Section 111(m) or impose a penalty under Section 112(a) was also affirmed. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was issued on 10.10.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>