https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283795 The court dismissed the writ appeal and petition, affirming the State Government's actions as constitutional. It upheld the withdrawal of concessions for backward classes, emphasizing that criteria for determining backward classes should not solely rely on caste but can include economic factors. The Governor's authority to issue Government Orders was upheld, and the court ruled that a writ of Mandamus cannot compel the State to exercise its discretion in a specific manner under Articles 15(4) and 16(4). en-us Mon, 08 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Oct 2019 12:39:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283795 The court dismissed the writ appeal and petition, affirming the State Government's actions as constitutional. It upheld the withdrawal of concessions for backward classes, emphasizing that criteria for determining backward classes should not solely rely on caste but can include economic factors. The Governor's authority to issue Government Orders was upheld, and the court ruled that a writ of Mandamus cannot compel the State to exercise its discretion in a specific manner under Articles 15(4) and 16(4). Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283795