<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1324 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283788</link>
    <description>Appeals concerning inclusion of NCCD in the computation of brand rate of drawback for exported goods were found not maintainable before the Tribunal. Applying the first proviso to Section 129A(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, the Tribunal held that such an order was outside its appellate jurisdiction and had to be pursued before the correct forum. The appeals and stay petitions were therefore disposed of for want of maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:28:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1324 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283788</link>
      <description>Appeals concerning inclusion of NCCD in the computation of brand rate of drawback for exported goods were found not maintainable before the Tribunal. Applying the first proviso to Section 129A(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, the Tribunal held that such an order was outside its appellate jurisdiction and had to be pursued before the correct forum. The appeals and stay petitions were therefore disposed of for want of maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>