<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20047</link>
    <description>Section 277 of the Income-tax Act was read broadly to cover not only an assessee but any person who makes a false statement in tax proceedings, so the challenge on maintainability failed. On the evidence, the Court accepted the confession statements and documentary material showing false returns, forged deduction certificates, fictitious bank accounts and receipt of refund amounts, and sustained the convictions. The reduction of the substantive sentence below the statutory minimum was not approved as a matter of law, although no further custodial interference was ordered in light of the lapse of time and the sentence already undergone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:05:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20047</link>
      <description>Section 277 of the Income-tax Act was read broadly to cover not only an assessee but any person who makes a false statement in tax proceedings, so the challenge on maintainability failed. On the evidence, the Court accepted the confession statements and documentary material showing false returns, forged deduction certificates, fictitious bank accounts and receipt of refund amounts, and sustained the convictions. The reduction of the substantive sentence below the statutory minimum was not approved as a matter of law, although no further custodial interference was ordered in light of the lapse of time and the sentence already undergone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>