<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 395 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386911</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty on cash advances but confirming the penalty on excess silver. It emphasized the discretionary nature of penalties under Section 271AAB, requiring the AO to consider individual circumstances. The Tribunal stressed the importance of detailed show cause notices for compliance with natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 395 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386911</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty on cash advances but confirming the penalty on excess silver. It emphasized the discretionary nature of penalties under Section 271AAB, requiring the AO to consider individual circumstances. The Tribunal stressed the importance of detailed show cause notices for compliance with natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>