<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 391 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, setting aside the disallowance of interest expenditure on unsecured loans for proprietary concerns. Emphasizing consistency in tax assessments and recognizing the lack of separate legal identity for proprietary concerns, the Tribunal concluded that the interest expenditure was an allowable business expense under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was rendered on 25th September 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:05:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 391 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, setting aside the disallowance of interest expenditure on unsecured loans for proprietary concerns. Emphasizing consistency in tax assessments and recognizing the lack of separate legal identity for proprietary concerns, the Tribunal concluded that the interest expenditure was an allowable business expense under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was rendered on 25th September 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>