<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 388 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386904</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the allowance of expenses claimed by the Assessee for travelling, legal charges, and maintenance. The Tribunal found that the expenses were essential for business purposes, supported by relevant documentation, and incurred in accordance with contractual obligations, thus qualifying as revenue expenditure necessary for the Assessee&#039;s business operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:03:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 388 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386904</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the allowance of expenses claimed by the Assessee for travelling, legal charges, and maintenance. The Tribunal found that the expenses were essential for business purposes, supported by relevant documentation, and incurred in accordance with contractual obligations, thus qualifying as revenue expenditure necessary for the Assessee&#039;s business operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>