<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 387 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) to allow the provision for warranty, based on the scientific estimation of provisions and supported by judicial pronouncements. The Tribunal found the provisions created and utilized for warranty claims to be close and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the relief granted to the assessee. The interpretation of judicial pronouncements emphasized the full allowance of provisions for warranty when estimated scientifically, starting from the point of sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:03:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 387 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) to allow the provision for warranty, based on the scientific estimation of provisions and supported by judicial pronouncements. The Tribunal found the provisions created and utilized for warranty claims to be close and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the relief granted to the assessee. The interpretation of judicial pronouncements emphasized the full allowance of provisions for warranty when estimated scientifically, starting from the point of sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>