<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 379 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386895</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the cross objections were disposed of accordingly. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings on the liability for confiscation, demand of differential duties, recovery of interest, and imposition of penalties, aligning with the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court in the case of Star Industries and other relevant judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 379 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386895</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the cross objections were disposed of accordingly. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings on the liability for confiscation, demand of differential duties, recovery of interest, and imposition of penalties, aligning with the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court in the case of Star Industries and other relevant judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>