https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386891 The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for condonation of delay and against the rejection of the claim, emphasizing the mandatory 14-day timeframe under Section 42 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Applicant's failure to provide sufficient cause and supporting evidence for the delay led to the dismissal, as the reasons provided were deemed inadequate and lacked documentary backing. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of meeting statutory requirements and concluded that the delay could not be condoned in this case. en-us Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:39:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386891 The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for condonation of delay and against the rejection of the claim, emphasizing the mandatory 14-day timeframe under Section 42 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Applicant's failure to provide sufficient cause and supporting evidence for the delay led to the dismissal, as the reasons provided were deemed inadequate and lacked documentary backing. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of meeting statutory requirements and concluded that the delay could not be condoned in this case. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386891