<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 374 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386890</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority allowed the voluntary liquidation petition filed by the Liquidator of a company under Section 59(7) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The company, &quot;BHOOVAHANA TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,&quot; initiated voluntary liquidation due to inactivity, with approvals from the Board of Directors and shareholders. The Liquidator completed necessary steps, including notifications to regulatory bodies, without receiving any claims. After verifying compliance, the company was dissolved, emphasizing that the order did not bar actions for prior violations. The judgment showcases meticulous adherence to legal requirements, ensuring a lawful conclusion to the liquidation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 374 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386890</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority allowed the voluntary liquidation petition filed by the Liquidator of a company under Section 59(7) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The company, &quot;BHOOVAHANA TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,&quot; initiated voluntary liquidation due to inactivity, with approvals from the Board of Directors and shareholders. The Liquidator completed necessary steps, including notifications to regulatory bodies, without receiving any claims. After verifying compliance, the company was dissolved, emphasizing that the order did not bar actions for prior violations. The judgment showcases meticulous adherence to legal requirements, ensuring a lawful conclusion to the liquidation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>