<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 373 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386889</link>
    <description>A financial creditor established default where the loan facility had been sanctioned and disbursed, the debt remained unpaid despite repeated demands, and the record showed subsisting default. The application also satisfied the procedural requirements for admission under the Insolvency Code because it was filed in the prescribed form with the requisite fee, was within limitation, and no disciplinary proceeding was pending against the proposed insolvency resolution professional. The Adjudicating Authority therefore held the application maintainable, admitted it, and ordered moratorium to operate in accordance with the Insolvency Code after substitution of the proposed resolution professional.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:38:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 373 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386889</link>
      <description>A financial creditor established default where the loan facility had been sanctioned and disbursed, the debt remained unpaid despite repeated demands, and the record showed subsisting default. The application also satisfied the procedural requirements for admission under the Insolvency Code because it was filed in the prescribed form with the requisite fee, was within limitation, and no disciplinary proceeding was pending against the proposed insolvency resolution professional. The Adjudicating Authority therefore held the application maintainable, admitted it, and ordered moratorium to operate in accordance with the Insolvency Code after substitution of the proposed resolution professional.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>