https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283767 An intra-court appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 lies only from an order passed by a Single Judge in original jurisdiction, not from an order rendered in supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227. Where the writ petition challenged an order of a subordinate civil court and the Single Judge examined that challenge as supervisory review over the lower court's decision, the proceeding was treated as one under Article 227. On that basis, the writ appeal was held not maintainable and liable to be dismissed. The distinction between Articles 226 and 227 was decisive, and the challenge to maintainability failed. en-us Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:58:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283767 An intra-court appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 lies only from an order passed by a Single Judge in original jurisdiction, not from an order rendered in supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227. Where the writ petition challenged an order of a subordinate civil court and the Single Judge examined that challenge as supervisory review over the lower court's decision, the proceeding was treated as one under Article 227. On that basis, the writ appeal was held not maintainable and liable to be dismissed. The distinction between Articles 226 and 227 was decisive, and the challenge to maintainability failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283767