https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283766 The text explains that judicial review of the Executive's choice of investigating agency under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 is limited to legality and the decision-making process. If the Central Government acts on relevant material and at multiple levels considers the matter before directing the NIA to investigate a scheduled offence, the court should not substitute its own view, and the executive direction remains valid. It also states that writ appeals were maintainable because the proceedings were in substance under Article 226, challenged an executive decision, and the bar relating to criminal jurisdiction did not apply. The judgment is described as upholding the NIA reference and restoring dismissal of the writ petitions. en-us Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:58:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283766 The text explains that judicial review of the Executive's choice of investigating agency under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 is limited to legality and the decision-making process. If the Central Government acts on relevant material and at multiple levels considers the matter before directing the NIA to investigate a scheduled offence, the court should not substitute its own view, and the executive direction remains valid. It also states that writ appeals were maintainable because the proceedings were in substance under Article 226, challenged an executive decision, and the bar relating to criminal jurisdiction did not apply. The judgment is described as upholding the NIA reference and restoring dismissal of the writ petitions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283766