<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 345 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386861</link>
    <description>The Department&#039;s income-tax appeal was held not maintainable because the tax effect fell below the monetary limit prescribed by the applicable CBDT circular. The Tribunal treated the enhanced appeal threshold as applicable to pending appeals and found no stated exception that would permit the Revenue&#039;s challenge to proceed. As a result, the appeal was dismissed as infructuous, leaving the underlying tax dispute undecided on merits and operating in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 345 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386861</link>
      <description>The Department&#039;s income-tax appeal was held not maintainable because the tax effect fell below the monetary limit prescribed by the applicable CBDT circular. The Tribunal treated the enhanced appeal threshold as applicable to pending appeals and found no stated exception that would permit the Revenue&#039;s challenge to proceed. As a result, the appeal was dismissed as infructuous, leaving the underlying tax dispute undecided on merits and operating in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>