<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 338 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386854</link>
    <description>The court remanded the case for further consideration, emphasizing the importance of evaluating all evidence, including conflicting reports from different food laboratories, to determine the fitness of the imported betel nuts for human consumption. The previous orders were not conclusive, and the court kept all points raised in the writ petition open for review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 338 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386854</link>
      <description>The court remanded the case for further consideration, emphasizing the importance of evaluating all evidence, including conflicting reports from different food laboratories, to determine the fitness of the imported betel nuts for human consumption. The previous orders were not conclusive, and the court kept all points raised in the writ petition open for review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>