<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 333 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386849</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the redemption fine and penalty to 10% and 5% respectively, based on established precedent. The appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the reduction was rejected, affirming the confiscation and value enhancement of imported goods. The Stay Petition of the Revenue was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 12:55:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 333 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386849</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the redemption fine and penalty to 10% and 5% respectively, based on established precedent. The appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the reduction was rejected, affirming the confiscation and value enhancement of imported goods. The Stay Petition of the Revenue was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>