https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283759 On permanent absorption from deputation, basic pay could not be reduced merely because the employee's overall emoluments increased through dearness pay or other components. The relevant comparison was between the pay drawn as a deputationist and the pay fixed on absorption, and a reduction in basic pay from 510 to 390 was treated as material and prejudicial. The Court held that higher aggregate salary did not cure the impermissible reduction in basic pay, so the impugned pay fixation could not be sustained and the appeal succeeded. en-us Thu, 22 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Oct 2019 12:50:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283759 On permanent absorption from deputation, basic pay could not be reduced merely because the employee's overall emoluments increased through dearness pay or other components. The relevant comparison was between the pay drawn as a deputationist and the pay fixed on absorption, and a reduction in basic pay from 510 to 390 was treated as material and prejudicial. The Court held that higher aggregate salary did not cure the impermissible reduction in basic pay, so the impugned pay fixation could not be sustained and the appeal succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283759