<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 328 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the order, allowing a refund of a certain amount while upholding the rejection of another, concerning eligibility, conditions interpretation, and limitation period for the refund claim. The decision aimed to ensure correct application of the law, uphold principles of granting refunds for services in exports, and adhere to the prescribed limitation period for such claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 328 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the order, allowing a refund of a certain amount while upholding the rejection of another, concerning eligibility, conditions interpretation, and limitation period for the refund claim. The decision aimed to ensure correct application of the law, uphold principles of granting refunds for services in exports, and adhere to the prescribed limitation period for such claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>