<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1646 - ITATJAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283735</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to adopt the registered valuer&#039;s report for the indexed cost of acquisition, allowing 50% of the indexed cost of improvement, dismissing the claim under section 54B, and allowing the deduction under section 54F for reconstruction expenses. The order was pronounced on 24.11.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:38:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1646 - ITATJAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283735</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to adopt the registered valuer&#039;s report for the indexed cost of acquisition, allowing 50% of the indexed cost of improvement, dismissing the claim under section 54B, and allowing the deduction under section 54F for reconstruction expenses. The order was pronounced on 24.11.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>