<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283744</link>
    <description>The court directed the Revisional Authority to consider all contentions, including the tax rate issue, in the Revision Petition challenging the compounding notice. The petitioner&#039;s payment of one-time tax is dependent on the Revisional Authority&#039;s decision. The court disposed of the Writ Petition with these directions, specifying that no costs are to be borne by either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:38:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283744</link>
      <description>The court directed the Revisional Authority to consider all contentions, including the tax rate issue, in the Revision Petition challenging the compounding notice. The petitioner&#039;s payment of one-time tax is dependent on the Revisional Authority&#039;s decision. The court disposed of the Writ Petition with these directions, specifying that no costs are to be borne by either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>