https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283755 The Bombay High Court declined to interfere with a show cause notice issued under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing Respondent No.4 to provide a hearing to the petitioners before passing a decision. The court stayed the implementation of any adverse order for two weeks and extended the bank guarantee deadline. The court disposed of the writ petition without expressing any opinion on the merits, leaving all contentions open and making no order as to costs. en-us Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:38:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283755 The Bombay High Court declined to interfere with a show cause notice issued under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing Respondent No.4 to provide a hearing to the petitioners before passing a decision. The court stayed the implementation of any adverse order for two weeks and extended the bank guarantee deadline. The court disposed of the writ petition without expressing any opinion on the merits, leaving all contentions open and making no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283755