<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1077 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances of interest paid, finding the Assessing Officer failed to prove non-business use of borrowed funds. Legal expenses disallowance was remanded for lack of evidence. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on scrutiny assessment timing, stating the notice was within limits or inapplicable. Assessees&#039; appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, while cross-objections and Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 14:41:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1077 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances of interest paid, finding the Assessing Officer failed to prove non-business use of borrowed funds. Legal expenses disallowance was remanded for lack of evidence. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on scrutiny assessment timing, stating the notice was within limits or inapplicable. Assessees&#039; appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, while cross-objections and Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>