<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1331 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under Section 271D. The Tribunal held that the transactions between the assessee and his daughter were genuine, conducted under a bonafide belief, and did not attract the provisions of Section 269SS. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced in the open Court on July 31, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 10:04:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1331 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under Section 271D. The Tribunal held that the transactions between the assessee and his daughter were genuine, conducted under a bonafide belief, and did not attract the provisions of Section 269SS. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced in the open Court on July 31, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>