https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386826 The writ petition was allowed, setting aside the DRP's order and remitting the matter back for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized the need for the DRP to address the petitioner's objections and provide reasoned conclusions. The DRP's failure to consider the petitioner's arguments and reliance on a previous decision without proper reasoning constituted a jurisdictional error. The Court directed the DRP to pass a reasoned order within eight weeks, allowing the petitioner to seek further remedies if still aggrieved. No costs were imposed, and the pending application was disposed of. en-us Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Nov 2019 17:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386826 The writ petition was allowed, setting aside the DRP's order and remitting the matter back for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized the need for the DRP to address the petitioner's objections and provide reasoned conclusions. The DRP's failure to consider the petitioner's arguments and reliance on a previous decision without proper reasoning constituted a jurisdictional error. The Court directed the DRP to pass a reasoned order within eight weeks, allowing the petitioner to seek further remedies if still aggrieved. No costs were imposed, and the pending application was disposed of. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386826