<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 35 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20015</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on all four issues, emphasizing the mandatory nature of Rule 1D for valuing unquoted shares and applying the legal fiction under Section 21(3) to treat the minor beneficiary&#039;s interest as absolute ownership for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:33:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 35 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20015</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on all four issues, emphasizing the mandatory nature of Rule 1D for valuing unquoted shares and applying the legal fiction under Section 21(3) to treat the minor beneficiary&#039;s interest as absolute ownership for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>