<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 285 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to restrict the penalty to 100% of the difference between the revised and original income, excluding specific disallowances. The order emphasized the importance of accurate returns and upheld the penalty for deliberate concealment of income, concluding that the appellant failed to furnish true particulars of income intentionally.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 07:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 285 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to restrict the penalty to 100% of the difference between the revised and original income, excluding specific disallowances. The order emphasized the importance of accurate returns and upheld the penalty for deliberate concealment of income, concluding that the appellant failed to furnish true particulars of income intentionally.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>