https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20012 In proceedings under section 482 CrPC challenging a charge framed for offences under sections 276C and 277 of the Income-tax Act, the High Court held that interference was unwarranted where prima facie material existed. The complaint and record indicated evidence that a valuable residue from cutting and grinding precious and semi-precious stones, described as "tal," had not been properly accounted for, and the Magistrate had considered the matter in detail. Applying the limited scope of interference at the charge stage, the Court found no absence of ground for proceeding and declined to disturb the order framing charge. The petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 08 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:26:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20012 In proceedings under section 482 CrPC challenging a charge framed for offences under sections 276C and 277 of the Income-tax Act, the High Court held that interference was unwarranted where prima facie material existed. The complaint and record indicated evidence that a valuable residue from cutting and grinding precious and semi-precious stones, described as "tal," had not been properly accounted for, and the Magistrate had considered the matter in detail. Applying the limited scope of interference at the charge stage, the Court found no absence of ground for proceeding and declined to disturb the order framing charge. The petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 08 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20012