<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 272 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386788</link>
    <description>The Authority for Advance Ruling disposed of the case as withdrawn after the Applicant voluntarily withdrew the application based on a CBIC circular clarifying the status of services under the IGST Act, 2017. The ruling provided closure to the ambiguity regarding whether the services supplied qualified as an export of service or if the Applicant qualified as an &quot;Intermediary&quot; under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 272 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386788</link>
      <description>The Authority for Advance Ruling disposed of the case as withdrawn after the Applicant voluntarily withdrew the application based on a CBIC circular clarifying the status of services under the IGST Act, 2017. The ruling provided closure to the ambiguity regarding whether the services supplied qualified as an export of service or if the Applicant qualified as an &quot;Intermediary&quot; under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>