<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 271 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386787</link>
    <description>An advance ruling application on the classification of dried coconut (shelled and peeled) was withdrawn after the applicant stated that provisional assessment had been sought. The AAR recorded the withdrawal and disposed of the application without examining the tariff classification dispute. No ruling was issued on the correct classification of the goods, and the substantive issue remained undecided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 271 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386787</link>
      <description>An advance ruling application on the classification of dried coconut (shelled and peeled) was withdrawn after the applicant stated that provisional assessment had been sought. The AAR recorded the withdrawal and disposed of the application without examining the tariff classification dispute. No ruling was issued on the correct classification of the goods, and the substantive issue remained undecided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>