<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 18 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20010</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s petition seeking a direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer legal questions to the High Court. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on factual inquiries, not legal issues, regarding the registration of partnership firms under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the necessity of factual evidence to determine if unlisted partners were involved in handling liquor, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments based on presumptions. The importance of factual determinations in establishing eligibility for registration was underscored, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:22:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 18 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20010</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s petition seeking a direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer legal questions to the High Court. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on factual inquiries, not legal issues, regarding the registration of partnership firms under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the necessity of factual evidence to determine if unlisted partners were involved in handling liquor, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments based on presumptions. The importance of factual determinations in establishing eligibility for registration was underscored, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>