https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386775 The court dismissed the appeal as the appellant failed to prove the genuineness of transactions and creditworthiness in relation to the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The court also found that the properties in question were not HUF properties, but individual properties of the appellant after a family settlement. The lower authorities' decisions were upheld, and no interference was warranted. en-us Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Oct 2019 22:19:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386775 The court dismissed the appeal as the appellant failed to prove the genuineness of transactions and creditworthiness in relation to the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The court also found that the properties in question were not HUF properties, but individual properties of the appellant after a family settlement. The lower authorities' decisions were upheld, and no interference was warranted. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386775