<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 251 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386767</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to delete the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2007-08. The Tribunal agreed that the nature of the expenditure was debatable, and the assessee had demonstrated bonafide in claiming it as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)&#039;s order and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 22:16:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 251 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386767</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to delete the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2007-08. The Tribunal agreed that the nature of the expenditure was debatable, and the assessee had demonstrated bonafide in claiming it as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)&#039;s order and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>