<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 250 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the notice&#039;s failure to specify the limb of Section 271(1)(c) under which the penalty was imposed rendered the penalty proceedings invalid. Citing legal precedents, including judgments by various High Courts and the Supreme Court, the Tribunal concluded that no penalty was leviable due to the deficiency in the notice, setting aside the penalty and ruling in favor of the Assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 22:15:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 250 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the notice&#039;s failure to specify the limb of Section 271(1)(c) under which the penalty was imposed rendered the penalty proceedings invalid. Citing legal precedents, including judgments by various High Courts and the Supreme Court, the Tribunal concluded that no penalty was leviable due to the deficiency in the notice, setting aside the penalty and ruling in favor of the Assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>