<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 234 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386750</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. The disallowance of bank charges amounting to Rs. 1,206 was upheld, while the addition of Rs. 23,00,000 on account of alleged unexplained investment under Section 69B was remanded for further verification. The order was pronounced on 28.06.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 21:47:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=590051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 234 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386750</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. The disallowance of bank charges amounting to Rs. 1,206 was upheld, while the addition of Rs. 23,00,000 on account of alleged unexplained investment under Section 69B was remanded for further verification. The order was pronounced on 28.06.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>