<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 29 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20006</link>
    <description>HC held that transport subsidy received by the assessee engaged in manufacture and sale of plywood and blackboards, under a State scheme for units in backward areas, constituted a revenue receipt taxable as business income. The Court found that the subsidy directly recouped transport expenditure, an incidental cost of the assessee&#039;s business, and was intended to support profitable operations rather than to subsidise capital outlay. On examining the scheme&#039;s terms, including its availability to existing and expanded units and its recurrent, expenditure-linked nature, HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion that the subsidy was inseparably connected with the assessee&#039;s trading operations. Both questions were answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 29 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20006</link>
      <description>HC held that transport subsidy received by the assessee engaged in manufacture and sale of plywood and blackboards, under a State scheme for units in backward areas, constituted a revenue receipt taxable as business income. The Court found that the subsidy directly recouped transport expenditure, an incidental cost of the assessee&#039;s business, and was intended to support profitable operations rather than to subsidise capital outlay. On examining the scheme&#039;s terms, including its availability to existing and expanded units and its recurrent, expenditure-linked nature, HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion that the subsidy was inseparably connected with the assessee&#039;s trading operations. Both questions were answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>